CRB Monitor News
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Licensing
  • Regulation
  • Markets
  • Securities
  • Research
SUBSCRIBE
  • Licensing
  • Regulation
  • Markets
  • Securities
  • Research
No Result
View All Result
CRB Monitor News
No Result
View All Result

More states allow cannabis businesses to deduct expenses as fed bill tries again to stem 280E

Maria Brosnan by Maria Brosnan
2 years ago
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
Home Regulation

One of the biggest financial challenges for cannabis businesses is paying taxes. And even though cannabis remains federally illegal as a controlled substance, the IRS still wants its cut of taxes… in full.

Known as 280E, as in Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code, companies that traffic in Schedule I and II drugs cannot deduct general business expenses, such payroll, rent and advertising. Essentially, because the business is illegal, companies can’t legally deduct the regular costs of doing business. But they are still expected to pay taxes. They can, however, reduce income by calculating the cost of goods sold.

U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer is once again trying to change the IRS code with the Small Business Tax Equity Act of 2023 (HR 2643), introduced April 17. It would exempt marijuana businesses conducting marijuana sales in compliance with state law from the 280E restriction. The bill currently awaits a hearing by the House Committee of Ways and Means.

RELATED POSTS

Cannabis Inversion Is a Problem Not Just in NY

El Capitan’s Nash Nears SEC Settlement

California Tax Freeze Moves Through Assembly

“State-legal cannabis businesses are denied equal treatment under 280E. They cannot fully deduct the cost of doing business which means they pay two or three times as much as a similar non-cannabis business,” said Blumenauer in an announcement. Blumenauer did not respond to a request for further comment.

“The two greatest challenges cannabis entrepreneurs are currently faced with are the lack of access to capital and unfair tax burdens,” said Saphira Galoob, executive director of the National Cannabis Roundtable in an announcement released by Blumenauer. “By eliminating the impact of 280E on state-legal cannabis operations, Congress would be giving these businesses, including small and minority operators, the opportunity to remain financially viable and to reinvest in their companies, communities, and workforce through tax credits and deductions that are routinely offered to other domestic industries.”

However, Mark Friedlich, vice president of U.S. Affairs for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting, said there is still no majority support in Congress to pass such a change, especially following the tough budget negotiations that has left the House floor in chaos. Friedlich is a member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee’s Chief Tax Counsel’s Advisory Board and an advisor to 14 state tax authorities.

“It won’t pass. We’ve had probably 18 bills introduced of this type over the last 10 years. They go nowhere,” he said.

CRB Monitor CRB Monitor CRB Monitor

New states allowing cannabis tax deductions

However, states that have legal cannabis markets are trying to make it financially easier on the companies by allowing state income tax deductions and credits.

Recently, Colorado, New Jersey and Washington, D.C., have passed laws allowing for tax deductions. In Illinois and Connecticut, budget bills including the tax provision await their governors’ signatures. And this year, cannabis business deductions are allowed in New York as part of the 2023 budget bill signed last year.

Additionally, Minnesota and Delaware, two of the newest states to legalize adult use, included business income tax deduction provisions in their legalization acts.

These states join others such as Arkansas, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Vermont in allowing cannabis businesses to deduct the costs of doing business from their state taxes.

Hard to measure impact on businesses

Accurately measuring the impact of these deductions on business operations and tax coffers, however, is not easy.

A letter from the Joint Committee on Taxation during the consideration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017 estimated changing 280E would result in $500 million in lost federal tax revenue for 2023, and $4 billion from 2018 through 2027. Since 2017 of course, several more states have opened to medicinal or adult use of cannabis, so the amount could be even higher today.

However, Bluemnauer reportedly believes such a change would result in increased tax revenue because more businesses would be encouraged to properly file their taxes.

Friedlich agreed that many cannabis businesses don’t report their full income. “That’s one of the problems. Small businesses, especially in the cannabis area, don’t want to claim anything because they are an all-cash business,” he said. “They would need to report income for the amount of deductions they are claiming.”

He said businesses fear that reporting in states would result in federal audits. “Rather than reducing their overall tax liability, it will increase liability because of audits that will be forthcoming.”

That may be the case in California. It enacted AB 37 in 2019, which allowed sole proprietorships and partnerships to claim credits and deductions beginning in 2020. These cannabis businesses are required to fill out tax information reporting form 4197. The legislation also required the state Franchise Tax Board to report to the legislature the number of deductions claimed in a tax year, as well as the total dollar amount.

In December, the FTB reported that as of April 2022, the number of 2020 tax returns reporting cannabis activities is still below a threshold to be disclosed under state taxpayer privacy rules. For tax year 2021, only 44 personal income tax returns included form 4197 indicating cannabis activities, and none claimed any deductions or credits.

FTB spokesperson Daniel Tahara said in an email that it is possible that businesses took deductions and credits but did not complete this form.

“No taxpayers operating under the Personal Income Tax Law filed 4797s indicating they had deductions or credits. However, the 4797 is informational only and there is no penalty for not including the form with their tax return. It is highly likely that many taxpayers should have filed the 4797, but didn’t, or filed the form but did not complete it correctly,” he said.

The FTB said taxpayers may not be aware of the form. “FTB is undertaking efforts to improve taxpayer awareness of the existence, purpose, and correct usage of form 4197,” it said in the report.

Additionally, under California Corporation Law, cannabis corporations have been able to claim state income tax deduction since Proposition 64 legalized commercial cannabis in 2016.

California offers new cannabis business credits

In addition to allowing expense deductions, California is offering two types of cannabis business credits for tax years 2023 through 2027. Both credits are nonrefundable but may be carried over eight years.

The High-Road Cannabis Tax Credit offers qualifying retailers and microbusinesses with employees a credit of up to 25% of their qualified employee-related business expenditures, up to $250,000. Because there’s a $20 million funding limit, businesses need to make a “Tentative Credit Reservation.” The reservation system is expected to be online July 1.

The $10,000 Cannabis Equity Tax Credit is available to equity licensees that have received approval of the fee waiver and deferral program administered by the California Department of Cannabis Control.

Keep up with all the news impacting the regulated cannabis market with the CRB Monitor weekly news digest. Subscribe now.
Tags: 280ECaliforniaColoradoConnecticutD.C.DelawareIllinoisMinnesotaNew JerseyNew YorkU.S.Washington
ShareTweet
Maria Brosnan

Maria Brosnan

Maria Brosnan brings to CRB Monitor more than 20 years of experience in financial journalism, marketing and communications. She began covering the cannabis industry during the early days of medical marijuana legalization as editor of The Marijuana Business Report for DealFlow Media. As editor of CRB Monitor News, she covers cannabis legislation, regulation and litigation while managing news content.

Related Posts

Commerce Clause Bid to Block Maryland Licensing Lottery Fails
Regulation

New Administration Pulls Out Old Tactic to Threaten Cannabis Business

1 day ago
CRB Monitor News
Regulation

Cannabis Inversion Is a Problem Not Just in NY

3 days ago
Markets

El Capitan’s Nash Nears SEC Settlement

2 weeks ago
California Tax Freeze Moves Through Assembly
Legislation

California Tax Freeze Moves Through Assembly

2 weeks ago
Next Post
Cannabis market

PR Credit Co-op Sues Dispensary Operator Over Suspicious Electronic Transactions

CRB Monitor - Marijuana Legalization and Pending Legislation

OK Gov. Vetoes Omnibus Medical Cannabis Regulation Bill, Enacts Other Laws

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Download

Read CRB Monitor’s Seminal Analysis of Cannabis Business Risk

Download

Popular Post

Commerce Clause Bid to Block Maryland Licensing Lottery Fails

New Administration Pulls Out Old Tactic to Threaten Cannabis Business

by Maria Brosnan
May 8, 2025
0

UPDATE: This story was updated at 10:10 p.m. CDT, May 8, to include President Donald Trump's withdrawal of Edward R....

CRB Monitor News

Cannabis Inversion Is a Problem Not Just in NY

by Zack Huffman
May 6, 2025
0

States choosing to legalize cannabis have always had to deal with legally grown products spreading into communities where it might...

Questions Remain About Trulieve’s Supposed $113M Tax Win

Alabama Judges Voids Third Attempt at Medical Licensing

by Zack Huffman
April 30, 2025
0

Sixteen months after issuing a restraining order that an appellate court recently overturned, a Montgomery County judge officially ended the...

CRB Monitor Securities Update | March 2025

by James Francis
April 29, 2025
0

While the goal of this newsletter is to be effectively a March-only report, as we put it together, it is...

Recent News post

Commerce Clause Bid to Block Maryland Licensing Lottery Fails

New Administration Pulls Out Old Tactic to Threaten Cannabis Business

May 8, 2025
CRB Monitor News

Cannabis Inversion Is a Problem Not Just in NY

May 6, 2025
Questions Remain About Trulieve’s Supposed $113M Tax Win

Alabama Judges Voids Third Attempt at Medical Licensing

April 30, 2025
CRB Monitor

Cannabis Corporate Intelligence

  • About us
  • Editorial
  • Home
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscription
  • Legislation
  • Licensing
  • Litigation
  • Markets
  • Premium
  • Regulation
  • Research
  • Securities
  • Resources
  • Leadership

© 2023-2025 Enhanced Compliance Solutions Inc.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Account
  • Cart
  • Checkout
    • Confirmation
    • Order History
    • Receipt
    • Transaction Failed
  • Checkout
  • Editorial
  • Home
  • Login
  • My account
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe data
  • Subscribe to our weekly licensing news digest
  • Subscription
    • Register to receive full access

© 2023-2025 Enhanced Compliance Solutions Inc.

×